Peculiarities of Usufruct in the Countries of Roman-German Law: Implementation of Best Practice in Ukrainian Law

AuthorRoman A. Maydanyk, Nataliia I. Maydanyk & Natalia R. Popova
PositionTaras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, UKRAINE School of Law/Vadym Hetman National Economic University of Kyiv, Kyiv, UKRAINE School of Law/National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, UKRAINE F. G. Burchak Scientific and Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship
Pages61-80
Center for Open Access in Science https://www.centerprode.com/ojls. html
Open Journal for Legal Studies, 2021, 4(2), 61-80.
ISSN (Online) 2620-0619 https://doi.org/10.32591/coas.ojls.0402.02061m
__________________________________________________ _______________________
© Authors. Terms and conditions of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) apply.
Correspondence: Roman A. Maydanyk, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, School of Law,
Kyiv, UKRAINE. E-mail: roman.maydanyk@gmail.com.
Peculiarities of Usufruct in the Countries of
Roman-German Law: Implementation of Best
Practice in Ukrainian Law
Roman A. Maydanyk
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, UKRAINE
School of Law
Nataliia I. Maydanyk
Vadym Hetman National Economic University of Kyiv, Kyiv, UKRAINE
School of Law
Natalia R. Popova
National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, UKRAINE
F. G. Burchak Scientific and Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship
Received: 7 June 2021  Accepted: 3 October 2021  Published Online: 10 N ovember 2021
Abstract
The article examines the features of usufruct in the European count ries of Romano -Germanic
law, determines the terms for the implementation of the best European practice of usufruct in
the law of Ukraine. The law of European countries of continental law recognizes the usufruct as
a real right of personal possession for use, which is considered an independent real right to
another's property or a kind of easement. The peculiarities of usufruct in some c ountries of
Romano-Germanic law, in particular in Germany , France, Georgia, Moldova and Russia, are
researched. The peculiarities of usufruct in some countries of Romano-Ge rmanic law, in
particular in Germany, France, Poland, the Netherland s, Switzerland, Georgia, Moldova an d
Russia, are researc hed. The issues of usufruct implementation in the law of Ukraine are
considered. The issues of usufruct implementation in the law of Ukraine are considered. The
authors came to the conclusion that it is necessary to introduce the institute of usufruct into th e
Ukrainian law by supplementing t he Civil Code of Ukraine with a new chapter Uzufruct, the
framework provisions of which are proposed in this paper.
Keywords: usufruct, quasi-usufruct, superficies, emphyteusis.
1. Introduction
In Ukraine, at the doctrinal and rule-making levels, the issue of introduction of the
institute of usufruct, which is unknown to national law, is discussed. The Europeanization and the
recodification of Ukrainian civil laws makes it necessary to study the best European practice in
order to determine the optimal conditions for the implementation of the legal construction of the
Usufruct.
R. A. Maydanyk, N. I. Maydanyk & N. R. Popova Peculiarities if the Usufruct in the Cou ntries of ...
__________________________________________________ _______________________
62
The historical roots of usufruct originate in the property law of Roman law of the
classical period. Usufruct and similar legal constructions (in the Digests of Justinian, they are all
classified as personal easements) distinguishes among the special property rights of their strictly
personal nature1.
The legal construction of the usufruct was received from Roman law into medieval
continental law and is now considered a traditional type of limited property rights of many legal
systems of continental Europe (Germany, France, Hungary, Italy, Switzerland), along with
easement and building rights (emphyteusis).
The Law of Ukraine to real rights to anothers property recognizes the right of
possession, the right to use anothers property (easement), the right to use land for agricultural
purposes (emphyteusis), the right to build land (superficies) (Part 1 of Article 395 of the Civil Code
of Ukraine), and also the right of economic management and the right of operative management
(articles 136, 137 of the Economic Code of Ukraine). The usufruct is not provided by the law of
Ukraine, despite the existence of a number of legal constructions similar to the usufruct.
When the current version of the Civil Code of Ukraine was adopted, there was no
urgent need for the usufruct institute due to the lack of a developed land market. Modern civil
legislation of Ukraine in terms of expanding the scope of private property rights has become
necessary to develop and implement in the Civil Code of Ukraine generally accepted in world
practice, the institution of usufruct.
The modern domestic civil doctrine discusses the idea of implementation the usufruct
institute in the law of Ukraine, which is reflected in some scientific papers2 and in the provisions
of the Concept of updating the Civil Code of Ukraine (the Concept of recodification), developed in
accordance with the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine On the establishment of a
working group on recodification (update) of civil legislation of Ukraine dated of 17 July 201ф 
650.3
The above is due to the relevance of identifying best practices and conditions for the
implementation of usufruct in the law of Ukraine. This study highlights usufruct in a Private Law
of the Ancient Rome (4.1), the features of usufruct in the countries of Romano-Germanic law (4.2)
and the conditions of implementation of usufruct in the law of Ukraine, taking into account the
best European practice (4.3).
2. The aim
The aim of this paper is to study the peculiarities of usufruct in the Roman-Germanic
Law countries and defining the conditions of its implementation in the Civil Law of Ukraine taking
into account the best European practice.
1 Doshdev, D. V. Rimskoye chastnoe pravo: Uchebnik dlja vuzov. M.: INFRA -M; NORMA, 1996. P. 415.
2 See: Maydanyk, R. A. Usufruct: European and Ukrainian Law // Problemy vdoskonalenn ja
pryvatnopravovyh mekhanizmiv nabuttja, peredachi, zdijsnennja ta zahysty subjektyvnyk prav: materialy
nauk.-prakt. Konf., prusvjach. Pamjati prof. Ch. N. Azimov ta 20-richu z dnja stvorennja kaf. zyv. Prava N 2
(Kharkiv, 29 lystop. 2019 r.). Kharkiv: Pravo, 2019. 396 s. S. 20-32; Smitjuh A. V. Schodo uzufrukta
korporatyvnyh paiv (chastok, akzij) // PRAVO I SUSPILSTVO N 3 / 2020/ - S. 74-79. [Elektronnnyj resurs].
Reshym dostupu: http://www.pravoisuspilstvo.org.ua/archive/2020/3_2020/13.pdf; Pavlenko O. O.,
Krasytska L. V. Usufrukt yak obmeshene rechove pravo // Visnyk studentskoho naukovoho tovarystva
DonNU imenu Vasylya Stusa. Tom 1 N 5 (2013). S. 82 -87. [Elektronnyj resurs]. Reshym dostupu:
https://jvestnik-sss.donnu.edu.ua/article/view/1213
3 Concept of Updating the Civil Code of Ukraine. Kyiv: Publishing House ‘ArtEk’, 2020. 1 2у p.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT